From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 11 07:15:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4AD916A420; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 07:15:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5933243D46; Sat, 11 Feb 2006 07:15:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1B7FqEQ099030; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 23:15:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id k1B7FqEu099029; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 23:15:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 23:15:52 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Daniel Eischen Message-ID: <20060211071552.GA99012@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20060210191637.374daa37@kan.dnsalias.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Dan Nelson , Alexander Kabaev Subject: Re: [jakub@redhat.com:Linking against libpthread via -pthread? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 07:15:55 -0000 On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 01:21:48AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Alexander Kabaev wrote: > > > > No. The change to link in libc by default and libpthread with -pthread > > are inthe works and will be committed shortly. There is not way around > > this if we want working versioned libc and libpthread in our system. > > Why is that? We really don't want -pthread to build in libpthread > dependency when linking shared libraries. Uh, well, you do if you want to use GCC 4.2.X -- Steve