From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 19 13:38:53 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA10501 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Tue, 19 Jan 1999 13:38:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from red.juniper.net (red.juniper.net [208.197.169.254]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA10495 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 1999 13:38:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tli@juniper.net) Received: from chimp.juniper.net (chimp.juniper.net [208.197.169.196]) by red.juniper.net (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA29703; Tue, 19 Jan 1999 13:38:43 -0800 (PST) Received: (from tli@localhost) by chimp.juniper.net (8.8.8/8.7.3) id VAA25947; Tue, 19 Jan 1999 21:38:43 GMT Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 21:38:43 GMT Message-Id: <199901192138.VAA25947@chimp.juniper.net> From: Tony Li To: chrismar@readington.com CC: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (message from Chris on Tue, 19 Jan 1999 16:45:56 -0500 (EST)) Subject: Re: Current Ethernet recommendations? Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG | When I asked that question about 8 months ago the answer was an Intel | EtherExpress 10/100+. It works great, but it was a little on the pricey | side: $90. I'd be more than happy to do that, but they seem to be falling off the face of the earth as there's a new generation of NICs out there that are much more cost effective. As a result, that NIC is no longer at Fry's. Next suggestion? Tony To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message