From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 19:17:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A1F4AE7; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:17:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from stenn.ntp.org (stenn.ntp.org [149.20.68.30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67D532E44; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:17:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.ntp.org ([::1] helo=stenn.ntp.org) by stenn.ntp.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1VgIsT-0003Q0-06; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 18:39:53 +0000 From: Harlan Stenn To: jadawin@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/171903: net-mgmt/observium port should only provide dependencies In-reply-to: <201311121304.rACD4VpM027695@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <201311121304.rACD4VpM027695@freefall.freebsd.org> Comments: In-reply-to jadawin@FreeBSD.org message dated "Tue, 12 Nov 2013 13:04:31 +0000." X-Mailer: MH-E 7.4.2; nmh 1.5; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22) Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 1.8) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 18:39:52 +0000 Message-Id: Cc: stenn@ntp.org, rflynn@acsalaska.net, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:17:29 -0000 Why was this bug closed with no apparent action taken with the patch I submitted? H