From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 4 20:06:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD71216A41F for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 20:06:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rschi@rsmba.biz) Received: from admin.cablespeed.com (admin.cablespeed.com [216.15.205.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FE6543D70 for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 20:06:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rschi@rsmba.biz) Received: from [66.235.9.146] (account schilling@cablespeed.com HELO [192.168.2.2]) by admin.cablespeed.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 57706380 for freebsd-java@freebsd.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 14:06:04 -0600 Message-ID: <436BBFE6.70205@rsmba.biz> Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 12:09:10 -0800 From: Richard Schilling Organization: Richard Schilling, MBA User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050318 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Fwd: Re: new error building jdk14] X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 20:06:05 -0000 Sean McNeil wrote: > > For amd64, you must use java 1.5. This is the only version available > for that platform. I have been using jdk1.5 for a long time now and it > works very well for me. I think I'll take that advice to heart.... :-) I forced the build, thinking that the ONLY_FOR_ARCHS setting was overlooked. The reasoning being that the i386 code should compile fine under gcc. Lesson learned..... > > Also, you should consider moving to 6-current. 5.4 has issues with the > linux emulation that cause building jdk1.5 a bit of a headache. There > are no such issues with 6-current. Is 6-current stable enough to be used in production? I'm having issues getting a kernel compiled in 5.4 as well. Was kind of worried about jumping to 6 until I knew what was wrong. Thanks! -- Richard