From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 1 18:19:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9824716A41F; Sun, 1 Jan 2006 18:19:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dunstan@freebsd.czest.pl) Received: from freebsd.czest.pl (freebsd.czest.pl [80.48.250.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADABE43D58; Sun, 1 Jan 2006 18:19:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dunstan@freebsd.czest.pl) Received: from freebsd.czest.pl (freebsd.czest.pl [80.48.250.4]) by freebsd.czest.pl (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k01IMSPx017972; Sun, 1 Jan 2006 18:22:28 GMT (envelope-from dunstan@freebsd.czest.pl) Received: (from dunstan@localhost) by freebsd.czest.pl (8.13.4/8.12.9/Submit) id k01IMSL5017971; Sun, 1 Jan 2006 18:22:28 GMT (envelope-from dunstan) Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 18:22:27 +0000 From: "Wojciech A. Koszek" To: Richard Todd Message-ID: <20060101182227.GB17837@FreeBSD.czest.pl> References: <20051221031526.31ABC290@mx2.synetsystems.com> <200512211111.44268.jhb@freebsd.org> <20051227173434.GA53513@FreeBSD.czest.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, rwatson@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bug in latest rev kern_acct.c: panic: Trying sleep, but thread marked as sleeping prohibited X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 18:19:20 -0000 On Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 06:39:31PM -0600, Richard Todd wrote: > "Wojciech A. Koszek" writes: > > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:11:43AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote: > >> acctwatch() probably isn't a good thing to do from a callout since it wants to > >> do VOPs and such. Probably the easiest fix is to stick acctwatch() in its > >> own kthread. > > > > I think I didn't break current behaviour. Patch is here: > > > > http://freebsd.czest.pl/dunstan/FreeBSD/kern_acct.0.patch > > > > Richard, could you try to repeat your problem with my patch? > > Got a chance to try a new kernel today with your patch. I tried to reproduce > the panic by repeatedly copying a bunch of stuff onto /usr and deleting it > in one window, and in another repeatedly doing "make configure; make clean" > in one rather large port. Lots of "Accounting suspended/resumed" messages > in the logs and no panics. So it's looking good from here. Thanks for testing this. I couldn't crash my box either. I belive that KASSERT() before suspend/resume handling will always be true, just like ACCT_ENABLED state. In the final version of the patch I'll include some cosmetic changes suggested by Robert Watson (thanks!). -- * Wojciech A. Koszek && dunstan@FreeBSD.czest.pl