From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 2 10:18:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1B516A4CE; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:18:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtpzilla5.xs4all.nl (smtpzilla5.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E8443FBF; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:18:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (freebie.xs4all.nl [213.84.32.253]) by smtpzilla5.xs4all.nl (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hB2II5S9019834; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 19:18:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hB2II5F3013750; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 19:18:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: (from wkb@localhost) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id hB2II5wW013749; Tue, 2 Dec 2003 19:18:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wkb) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 19:18:05 +0100 From: Wilko Bulte To: "M. Warner Losh" Message-ID: <20031202181805.GA13722@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <20031202112236.GA77263@fit.vutbr.cz> <20031202.101425.81994360.imp@bsdimp.com> <20031202102446.S57336@pooker.samsco.home> <20031202.111148.78753608.imp@bsdimp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031202.111148.78753608.imp@bsdimp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-OS: FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE X-PGP: finger wilko@freebsd.org cc: cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to disable devices in -current / 5.2-BETA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 18:18:16 -0000 On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 11:11:48AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20031202102446.S57336@pooker.samsco.home> > Scott Long writes: > : However, having a general mechanism for disabling newbus devices would be > : really nice. > > Agreed. But today and 5.2 you lose. However, it isn't easy. What > does disabled mean? Don't attach? Don't even probe? If you don't You could disable the driver altogether. Assuming that is what is desired. -- | / o / /_ _ |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte wilko@FreeBSD.org