Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 31 Aug 2014 09:10:25 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 193196] New: [patch][stage][new-maintainer] amanda-server and amanda-client: Stage support and take maintainership
Message-ID:  <bug-193196-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193196

            Bug ID: 193196
           Summary: [patch][stage][new-maintainer] amanda-server and
                    amanda-client: Stage support and take maintainership
           Product: Ports Tree
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: Needs Triage
          Severity: Affects Some People
          Priority: ---
         Component: Individual Port(s)
          Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: fbsd@dylanleigh.net

Created attachment 146586
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=146586&action=edit
Imperfect patch to add staging support and new maintaner for
amanda-server/amanda-client

The attached patch adds stage support to amanda-server (and amanda-client,
which is a slave port of amanda-server). It also sets me as the maintainer (was
unmaintained).

It builds and runs OK on my 9-STABLE AMD64 fileserver, but there are some
possible stage-related issues:

1) Amanda (upstream code) builds its own install-hook target which it uses to
set setuid bits amongst other things, This isn't ideal and prevents packages
being built as non-root amongst other things. I have tried to fix this but
haven't had the time yet to figure it out so I have set NEEDS_ROOT in the
Makefile for now.

2) Many reported orphans were added to the plist after several iterations of
the patch, and I am not sure if I have set everything correctly so that files
which will only be present given certain OPTIONS are set correctly in the plist
and vice versa. Some of the reported orphans from make check-orphans seem to be
false positives caused by the way the port splits up building the client and
server.

This is my first staging patch, so I expect errors. Please let me know if there
is anything missing.

-- Dylan

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-193196-13>