From owner-freebsd-current Sun Mar 10 8:46:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from zen.estpak.ee (zen.estpak.ee [194.126.101.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8E937B416; Sun, 10 Mar 2002 08:46:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from myhakas.estpak.ee (myhakas.estpak.ee [194.126.115.54]) by zen.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E3D6E918; Sun, 10 Mar 2002 18:46:41 +0200 (EET) Received: from myhakas.estpak.ee (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by myhakas.estpak.ee (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g2AGke7t021430; Sun, 10 Mar 2002 18:46:40 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from vallo@myhakas.estpak.ee) Received: (from vallo@localhost) by myhakas.estpak.ee (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id g2AGkeWa021429; Sun, 10 Mar 2002 18:46:40 +0200 (EET) Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 18:46:40 +0200 From: Vallo Kallaste To: Robert Watson Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Serial break into debugger broken from 'cu' on -CURRENT? Message-ID: <20020310164640.GA21339@myhakas.estpak.ee> Reply-To: kalts@estpak.ee References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.0i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 10:07:07AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: > (1) Is serial break currently broken in -CURRENT > (2) Is serial break currently broken in 'cu'? > > I have't had a chance to follow up on either, but was wondering if anyone > else had experienced this? Essentially, hitting ~# in cu no longer > results in boxes dropping to the debugger. Enabling the alternative break > and using ~^B works fine, and Ctrl-Alt-Escape works fine on the real > console. I've been unable to send break using -current cu to some Cisco's which I had to configure recently. Ecu from ports did work however. As I was -stable user some weeks ago I know that cu in -stable did work. The other thing I noticed was that -current cu handles speed switch differently, e.g.: stable: cu -l /dev/cuaa1 -9600 works well current: cu -l /dev/cuaa1 -9600 will connect to cuaa0 not cuaa1.. -s 9600 will work however. What I recall is that some time back uucp was shaken out of base system and cu also, cu's functionality was folded back to tip. Stable indeed has different tip and cu binaries, in -current there's hard link. -- Vallo Kallaste kalts@estpak.ee To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message