From owner-freebsd-security Mon Feb 3 13:28:11 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA21352 for security-outgoing; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 13:28:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from sax.sax.de (sax.sax.de [193.175.26.33]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA21259; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 13:27:18 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by sax.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id WAA10749; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 22:25:19 +0100 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.8.5/8.6.9) id WAA14166; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 22:05:12 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1997 22:05:12 +0100 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: jgreco@solaria.sol.net (Joe Greco) Cc: security@freebsd.org, core@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question: 2.1.7? References: <199702031422.IAA17586@solaria.sol.net> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.55-PL10 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-PGP-Fingerprint: DC 47 E6 E4 FF A6 E9 8F 93 21 E0 7D F9 12 D6 4E Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) In-Reply-To: <199702031422.IAA17586@solaria.sol.net>; from Joe Greco on Feb 3, 1997 08:22:08 -0500 Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As Joe Greco wrote: > If not, maybe a "patchkit" that could be installed (source or binary, > whatever) could be done. But I think a "2.1.7" type release would be > most ideal... I think our basic position to this is that we don't mind, as long as somebody is going to do the work. We are simply unable to maintain three diverging branches. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)