From owner-freebsd-current Thu Mar 16 6:31:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from news-ma.rhein-neckar.de (news-ma.rhein-neckar.de [193.197.90.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2ADE37BA3C for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 06:31:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from daemon@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de) Received: from bigeye.rhein-neckar.de (uucp@localhost) by news-ma.rhein-neckar.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with bsmtp id PAA09590 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 15:31:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from daemon@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by bigeye.rhein-neckar.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA43565 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2000 13:42:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from daemon) From: naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de (Christian Weisgerber) Subject: Re: gcc -Os optimisation broken (RELENG_4) Date: 16 Mar 2000 13:42:56 +0100 Message-ID: <8aqksg$1ah2$1@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de> References: <38CF48CF.59A100D7@altavista.net> <38D08908.C629B55E@gorean.org> <38D08ADF.9C28C61E@cvzoom.net> <20000316023655.B64165@dragon.nuxi.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG David O'Brien wrote: > What??? 'pentiumpro' code isn't going to be very optimized for a Pentium > (if it even runs at all). According to the gcc(1) man page, -mpentiumpro is synonymous to -mcpu=pentiumpro, which only affects instruction scheduling but not the actual instruction set used (for that, use -march=...). So it certainly should run. If you are aware that the man page is wrong in this respect, please tell us! -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message