From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 1 17:21:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D099CDF3 for ; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 17:21:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8196D10CD for ; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 17:21:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rB1HLZu9006005; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 10:21:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id rB1HLZBT006002; Sun, 1 Dec 2013 10:21:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 10:21:35 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: "Mike." Subject: Re: gmirror, gpart and MBR vs GPT in the Handbook In-Reply-To: <201312011121580096.005D00FB@smtp.24cl.home> Message-ID: References: <201311301303210813.05DE187E@smtp.24cl.home> <201312011121580096.005D00FB@smtp.24cl.home> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 01 Dec 2013 10:21:35 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2013 17:21:36 -0000 On Sun, 1 Dec 2013, Mike. wrote: > On 11/30/2013 at 2:17 PM Warren Block wrote: > > |On Sat, 30 Nov 2013, Mike. wrote: > | > | [snip] > | > |> Is there a specific reason why MBR was used in the Handbook > |> example for creating a mirror, instead of GPT? > | > |Yes, there was, see the last paragraph of the Metadata Issues > |subsection, > |http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/geom-m > irror.html#geom-mirror-metadata > | > |[snip] > ============= > > > A question about the wording of that paragraph. The second > sentence states: > > "Because GPT partition schemes also store metadata at the end of > the disk, mirroring full GPT disks with gmirror(8) is not > recommended." > > > The word "full" is ambiguous. Is it to mean, "full" as in 'full > of data', or "full" as in 'the entire disk'? It means mirroring an entire disk, including boot blocks and metadata, rather than just parts of it like partitions or filesystems. I'll work on rewriting that paragraph for clarity.