From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Sep 26 16:59:26 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA17379 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 26 Sep 1996 16:59:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-gw01.ny.us.ibm.net (smtp-gw01.ny.us.ibm.net [165.87.194.252]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA17327 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 1996 16:59:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by smtp-gw01.ny.us.ibm.net (8.6.9/8.6.9) id XAA146744 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 1996 23:59:18 GMT Received: from slip129-37-239-84.co.us.ibm.net(129.37.239.84) by smtp-gw01.ny.us.ibm.net via smap (V1.3mjr) id smaYgoDM2; Thu Sep 26 23:54:34 1996 Message-ID: <324B17E2.383898F5@ibm.net> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 17:55:14 -0600 From: Einer Petersen X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (X11; I; Linux 2.0.20 i586) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: SMP Support on Intel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi guys ..... Does FreeBSD support Multiple Pentium processors yet ? If it does..... 1. How do you enable it ? 2. How stable is it ? 3. How many processes can be in kernel space concurrently ? 4. Is there any Real time scheduling / scheduling class ? The reason I am asking all these questions is that I would rather use FreeBSD, to which I have grown accustomed and generaly like, than Solaris x86 (Too pricey for an OS that comes without a compiler) or UnixWare (which I do not have many kind words for!) or NT (which still has not proven anything of value when it comes to True Multi-User opperating system) ...... Hmmmm ..... I must be a BSD Unix biggot !?!?!?! .... even Linux just does not quite hit the spot ! Einer Petersen einer@ibm.net