From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 4 03:04:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E3616A407 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2007 03:04:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from mx1.highperformance.net (dsl081-163-122.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.163.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666F113C44B for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2007 03:04:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from [192.168.1.16] (w16.stradamotorsports.com [192.168.1.16]) by mx1.highperformance.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l042s4iW044400 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 18:54:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Message-ID: <459C6C66.6010903@highperformance.net> Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 18:54:30 -0800 From: "Jason C. Wells" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd general questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=2.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on s4.stradamotorsports.com Subject: Best SPF Implementation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 03:04:25 -0000 Which of the ports provides the best SPF implementation for FreeBSD running sendmail? I messed around with SPF when it was still in it's infancy. There seem to be more choices now. I value ease of use if that is a useful discrimination. I really need to add something to spamassasin to prevent receiving the spam in the first place. I hate spending time on this but these guys are killing me. Thanks, Jason C. Wells