From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Sep 26 18:21:47 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA12557
          for questions-outgoing; Thu, 26 Sep 1996 18:21:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ra.mscnet.net (mscnet.net [207.100.82.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA12495
          for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 26 Sep 1996 18:21:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from freebsd@localhost) by ra.mscnet.net (8.7.5/8.6.12) id VAA17857; Thu, 26 Sep 1996 21:24:02 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 21:24:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: FreeBSD Mailing List Recieving Account <freebsd@ra.mscnet.net>
To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Sprints response to to wcarchive connectivity problems
In-Reply-To: <9609261821.AB24484@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960926212051.17759A-100000@ra.mscnet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 26 Sep 1996, Daniel Eischen wrote:

>   "cdrom.com's provider, crl.com, is connected to the internet via a
>   non-approved poor router. The router is hosing causing flapping problems.
>   This is also due to the fact that crl does not properly peer. In other
>   words, crl and therefore crl's customer is not holding up to acceptable use
>   policies. The destination is deliberately blocked when the router flaps so
>   as to prevent flapping throughout the network."

Sprint wants everyone to use the same crappy Cisco's that they use. Who 
cares if they can't handle the routing tables or go down every few hours, 
right? :)

J - Glad we're not a Sprint customer...