Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 19:51:47 -0700 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Chris Johnson <dcj-dated-1029700538.cdahiege@palomine.net> Cc: Vitor de Matos Carvalho <vitor@softinfo.com.br>, FreeBSD-Stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: RELENG_4 Message-ID: <200208190251.g7J2plap080880@intruder.bmah.org> In-Reply-To: <20020818195741.GA45055@palomine.net> References: <003901c246ee$77676220$020aa8c0@acaraje> <20020818194110.GA44649@palomine.net> <004701c246f0$825ec720$020aa8c0@acaraje> <20020818195741.GA45055@palomine.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==_Exmh_688850249P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Chris Johnson wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 04:50:28PM -0300, Vitor de Matos Carvalho wrote: > > Because when it left the 4.1.1-release version turned STABLE? > > I may be wrong, but I believe that was before the invention of the security > branches. 4.1.1-RELEASE was a snapshot of RELENG_4--I don't think there was a > RELENG_4_1--but 4.6.2-RELEASE isn't. 4.6.2-RELEASE is a snapshot of the > security branch, RELENG_4_6. This is correct. 4.1.1-RELEASE was a "look, ma, we can get rid of RSAREF" snapshot of RELENG_4. There wasn't much QA done on that release, that's why we erred on the side of caution in trying to put out 4.6.2-RELEASE. Bruce. --==_Exmh_688850249P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5+ 20020506 iD8DBQE9YF1D2MoxcVugUsMRAqzBAJ9yawvNrZ8ZA7jaydYelk+tRqnp1QCeMGnW oF3yhT6N8y6wTnLikG4u1X4= =1Jkt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_688850249P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200208190251.g7J2plap080880>