From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 13 18:33:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 955C316A406 for ; Sun, 13 May 2007 18:33:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7890A13C48C for ; Sun, 13 May 2007 18:33:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l4DIU949096647; Sun, 13 May 2007 11:30:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.1/8.13.8/Submit) id l4DIU9u0096646; Sun, 13 May 2007 11:30:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 11:30:09 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav Message-ID: <20070513183009.GA96018@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20070513175425.GA64710@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <864pmg1t1s.fsf@dwp.des.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <864pmg1t1s.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Process for requesting reverting patch? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 18:33:57 -0000 On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 08:23:43PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > Steve Kargl writes: > > What is the formal process to get a recent commit to -current > > reverted? Do I send email to core? > > You start by talking to the person who did the commit. That much should > be obvious. > I would expect a committer, who changes something as important as the default shell in FreeBSD, to read the freebsd-current mailing list and the PR database. -- Steve