From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Apr 4 13:52:17 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA05970 for chat-outgoing; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 13:52:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA05953 for ; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 13:52:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id NAA01640; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 13:51:31 -0800 (PST) To: Pedro Giffuni cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BSD's Mascot In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 04 Apr 1997 10:16:36 PST." <33454584.39D4@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> Date: Fri, 04 Apr 1997 13:51:31 -0800 Message-ID: <1637.860190691@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I read some time ago that the "deamons" used by BSD were not so devilish > after all. The term deamon , in it's latin roots, refers to a higher > power, good or bad. In UNIX it is recognized that there are good and bad > deamons. Greg Lehey has a synopsis of this in his book. Indeed, they're not devlish. > evil or devils, but probably our mascot will not gain acceptance in > certain countries where religious issues are really important (Israel, > Iran, Irak...). I can live with that. :-) Jordan