From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug  3 16:22:36 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B286716A4CE
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Tue,  3 Aug 2004 16:22:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from conure.mail.pas.earthlink.net (conure.mail.pas.earthlink.net
	[207.217.120.54])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A369A43D1D
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Tue,  3 Aug 2004 16:22:36 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from hakim.singhji@earthlink.net)
Received: from waldorf.psp.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.78.20])
	by conure.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 1Bs23g-0006aP-00
	for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 03 Aug 2004 09:22:36 -0700
Message-ID: <11420531.1091550155733.JavaMail.root@waldorf.psp.pas.earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 12:22:34 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
From: "Hakim Z. Singhji" <hakim.singhji@earthlink.net>
To: questions@freebsd.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Earthlink Zoo Mail 1.0
Subject: Questions on IPFW???
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "Hakim Z. Singhji" <hakim.singhji@earthlink.net>
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 16:22:36 -0000

Hey guys,

Question, when NAT overloading is it possible to use only IPFW rules to pass TCP/UDP packects to remote ip addresses within the network? Or do you have to use natd...because IPFW allows you to execute the following for example:

****************************************************
ip from 192.168.99.100 80 to 192.168.99.101 9981
****************************************************

or even in conjunction with a dummynet rule of somesort?


Hakim Z. Singhji 
New York University
pub 1024D/A4F3B64A 2004-07-30 Hakim Z. Singhji (NYU) <hakim.singhji@earthlink.net>
Key fingerprint = 1407 12D9 73F2 5C38 45CE C387 953F 5657 A4F3 B64A