From owner-freebsd-smp Mon Apr 28 02:03:58 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA02768 for smp-outgoing; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 02:03:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA02756 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 02:03:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (Haldjas.folklore.ee [193.40.6.121]) by who.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id CAA00806 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 02:03:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (narvi@localhost) by haldjas.folklore.ee (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id MAA15686; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 12:04:36 +0300 (EEST) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 12:04:34 +0300 (EEST) From: Narvi To: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" cc: smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Quad Pro 150 motherboard? In-Reply-To: <199704280743.AAA26201@MindBender.serv.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 28 Apr 1997, Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com wrote: > > >a 4 or 6 CPU P6 board for *other* than a large server...think about that > >for a few minutes. > > > >(hint: NT4 Workstation can't handle more than 2CPUs and that is the most > >popular commercial SMP-capable OS) > > Bullshit. Well, at least 2 of the 2 NT workstations installed from 2 different CD-s claim they are capable of upto 2 proc-s. I haven't also seen in any place a reference that says otherwise. Sander > [snip] > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Michael L. VanLoon michaelv@MindBender.serv.net > --< Free your mind and your machine -- NetBSD free un*x >-- > NetBSD working ports: 386+PC, Mac 68k, Amiga, Atari 68k, HP300, Sun3, > Sun4/4c/4m, DEC MIPS, DEC Alpha, PC532, VAX, MVME68k, arm32... > NetBSD ports in progress: PICA, others... > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >