From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 11 02:30:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D74B16A4CE for ; Tue, 11 May 2004 02:30:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF7743D53 for ; Tue, 11 May 2004 02:30:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i4B9UDYI017132 for ; Tue, 11 May 2004 02:30:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i4B9UDFa017126; Tue, 11 May 2004 02:30:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 02:30:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200405110930.i4B9UDFa017126@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Oliver Eikemeier Subject: Re: ports/66387: Repocopy: suggest moving net/p5-perl-ldap to net/p5-Net-LDAP X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Oliver Eikemeier List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 09:30:13 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/66387; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Oliver Eikemeier To: Florent Thoumie Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/66387: Repocopy: suggest moving net/p5-perl-ldap to net/p5-Net-LDAP Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 11:19:29 +0200 Florent Thoumie wrote: > Port's name is based on the distribution name. That, and because the official project name is `perl-ldap': > I suggest it can be change to p5-Net-LDAP which is more natural as it installs > Net/LDAP.pm and is often referenced as Net::LDAP. NetBSD has it as databases/p5-perl-ldap: OpenBSD uses databases/p5-ldap: Gentoo has dev-perl/perl-ldap: I guess people coming from ldap.perl.org will find it quickly, others searching for Net::LDAP will need a bit more time, and people usings ports won't care because the dependencies are taken care of for them. I might have followed your suggestion if this were a new port, but I don't believe the given rationale justifies the effort of an repocopy. -Oliver