From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Sun Jul 14 03:26:40 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2062A15D5B69; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 03:26:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [18.222.6.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76F75849AC; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 03:26:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (unknown [18.188.142.31]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 472581FCD4; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 03:26:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 03:26:37 +0000 From: Mark Linimon To: Piotr Kubaj Cc: Mark Linimon , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r506498 - in head: devel/py-lxml editors/encryptpad games/lpairs graphics/comical lang/harbour mail/archiveopteryx mail/archiveopteryx-devel multimedia/oscam news/nget Message-ID: <20190714032636.GD18049@lonesome.com> References: <201907130007.x6D07Z4Z010235@repo.freebsd.org> <20190713002946.GA99641@ThinkPad-X200.g.anongoth.pl> <20190713004647.GA32051@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190713004647.GA32051@lonesome.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 76F75849AC X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.19 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.67)[-0.668,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.87)[0.874,0]; IP_SCORE(-0.25)[ip: (0.03), ipnet: 18.220.0.0/14(0.14), asn: 16509(-1.34), country: US(-0.06)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[lonesome.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.84)[-0.839,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[11.6.222.18.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mail.soaustin.net]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:18.220.0.0/14, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 03:26:40 -0000 On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 12:46:47AM +0000, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sat, Jul 13, 2019 at 02:29:46AM +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > > Why not put USES=compiler:c11 for those ports where you set > > USE_GCC=yes after checking whether we use base GCC? > > Possibly. I was really focussed on smashing the ARCH definitions; > most of these changes were to things that would not have been fixed > by USES. After looking at this, this is "case 8" of my to-do list. We need to figure out whether we want to eliminate all the instances thereof. I figure if I do it, danfe will complain that I didn't test it with c89 or c99 first, because those are the "most correct". Right now I just feel like I can't win. mcl