From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 26 20:15:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830CD16A4CE; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:15:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1BE343D2F; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:15:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([69.160.65.223]) by mta10.adelphia.netESMTP <20050226201511.EWXB6134.mta10.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net>; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:15:11 -0500 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6093CB508; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:15:30 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:15:30 -0500 From: Parv To: Lowell Gilbert Message-ID: <20050226201529.GA7632@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Lowell Gilbert , hrs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4220563F.5050802@freebsd.org> <443bvjcg27.fsf_-_@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <443bvjcg27.fsf_-_@be-well.ilk.org> cc: hrs@FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dvips X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:15:12 -0000 in message <443bvjcg27.fsf_-_@be-well.ilk.org>, wrote Lowell Gilbert thusly... > > teTeX-base now configures with dvips disabled, but it also claims > to conflict with the dvips port. How do you get dvips installed > these days? Did you try the 'k' port, print/dvipsk-tetex, which is also listed on print/teTex metaport? And from print/dvipsk-tetex/Makefile ... CONFLICTS= *-teTeX-[0-9]* \ ja-ptex-*-[0-9]* \ dvips-[0-9]* \ *-dvips-[0-9]* \ *-dvipsk-[0-9]* ... so it seems it won't be conflicting w/ teTeX-base. - Parv --