From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 30 17:54:55 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7276B1065675 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 17:54:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsdml@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B4A28FC0A for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 17:54:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.225] (atoulouse-256-1-32-183.w90-38.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.38.175.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2BA543B4E for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 12:35:15 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4EAD8AD0.6040504@marino.st> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 18:35:12 +0100 From: John Marino User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: AMD64 version of GNAT Ada compiler broken due to libthr X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 17:54:55 -0000 On 10/30/2011 4:41 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On the last day of 2010, Daniel Eischen wrote: >> I've got FSF paperwork on file, specifically to submit my original >> FreeBSD and VxWorks GNAT ports to AdaCore (which they then upstreamed >> to GCC). It's been a few years since I submitted the paperwork, >> however, and I'm not sure if they require resubmittal at periodic >> intervals. It may be possible for you to explain your changes to >> me, without me looking at your original code or changes. > > This is generally not necessary. Your paperwork with the FSF holds > without a need to renew, except that if you changed employers and > require an employer disclaimer that might need to be sent for the > new employer. > > Not sure whether the concrete question here is still open of course, > but I'll also be happy to see how I can help in case. > > Gerald > Hi Gerald, As a matter of fact, I have assigned my copyright to the FSF a while ago, so there's nothing preventing me from submitting this patch in my name. It's on my todo list. Getting through GCC patch procedure is gruesome though, and I have dozens... John