From owner-freebsd-questions Sat May 31 11:10:57 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA01969 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 31 May 1997 11:10:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mpeks.tomsk.su (mpeks.tomsk.su [193.124.182.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA01962 for ; Sat, 31 May 1997 11:10:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by mpeks.tomsk.su (8.6.11/8.6.9) with UUCP id CAA06575; Sun, 1 Jun 1997 02:09:32 +0800 Received: (from vas@localhost) by vas.tomsk.su (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA05131; Sat, 31 May 1997 13:56:45 +0800 (TSD) From: "Victor A. Sudakov" Message-Id: <199705310556.NAA05131@vas.tomsk.su> Subject: Re: 2 reply addresses To: randyk@ccsales.com (Randy Katz) Date: Sat, 31 May 1997 13:56:44 +0800 (TSD) Cc: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Randy Katz" at "May 29, 97 07:49:28 am" Organization: Tomsk Region Education Department X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Randy Katz wrote: > You can even specify that if it's from so&so (specifically) that it gets > treated a certain way. It's all in procmail...little complicated but once > it's working and you understand the syntax it's *REAL COOL*. I would be very grateful if you or somebody else could post here his/her .procmailrc file tweaked for the freebsd mailing lists. It is always difficult to start. Now I use the elm filter that looks less scary. And another question. When you use procmail, does the .forward file really have to be so complicated as described in the manual? Why cannot it be simple something like "|/usr/local/bin/procmail" -- Victor Sudakov http://www.tomsk.su/r/persons/vas.htm