Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:33:44 +0000
From:      Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk>
To:        des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ), freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Cc:        Carol Overes <caroloveres@yahoo.com>
Subject:   Re: Secure updating of OS and ports
Message-ID:  <5.0.2.1.1.20031118133154.0318b7c8@popserver.sfu.ca>
In-Reply-To: <xzp7k1yxdev.fsf@dwp.des.no>
References:  <5.0.2.1.1.20031117165641.03101720@popserver.sfu.ca> <5.0.2.1.1.20031117165641.03101720@popserver.sfu.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 09:56 18/11/2003 +0100, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote:
>Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> writes:
> >    CVSup is insecure.  FreeBSD Update might do what you want, but
> > you'd have to trust me. :)
>
>...and three-hundred-odd FreeBSD developers.

   True, but there's a slight difference there -- people can look at the=20
FreeBSD source code, but it's rather difficult to audit the binary updates=
=20
I publish.

Colin Percival



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.0.2.1.1.20031118133154.0318b7c8>