From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jul 10 15:20:34 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5057637B400 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:20:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8FFC43E54 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 15:20:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA19424; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 08:19:51 +1000 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 08:23:06 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org To: Giorgos Keramidas Cc: Matthew Dillon , Dag-Erling Smorgrav , Subject: Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure In-Reply-To: <20020710212942.GC4189@hades.hell.gr> Message-ID: <20020711081715.R21520-100000@gamplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > The extra verboseness is fine, and I was almost finished posting a > note that mentioned it. But I didn't thinking that the __printf0like > bugs will never be fixed if we hide them by patching chmod. It was "fixed" more than a month ago: % RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/contrib/gcc/c-format.c,v % Working file: c-format.c % head: 1.4 % ... % ---------------------------- % revision 1.3 % date: 2002/05/22 16:37:09; author: obrien; state: Exp; lines: +83 -6 % 1/2assed reimplementation of c-common.c revs 1.2 (-fformat-extensions) % and 1.3 (printf0) for GCC 3.1. % ---------------------------- The printf0 part always worked on i386's and doesn't seem to have any machine dependencies. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message