From owner-freebsd-questions  Sun Apr 25 23:45:38 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from be.elwood.net (unknown [208.165.128.15])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3199150C1
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 25 Apr 1999 23:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jameso@be.elwood.net)
Received: (from jameso@localhost)
	by be.elwood.net (8.9.2/8.8.8) id BAA32173
	for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Apr 1999 01:45:35 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from jameso)
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 01:45:34 -0500
From: Jim <jameso@elwood.net>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: NAT Info
Message-ID: <19990426014534.A31635@elwood.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i
X-Whaa: You read headers?
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Quick Question: Anyone have any info on Linux's IP Masq vs BSD's NAT? Are
there *any* areas where one is better then the other? I have hard some
people saying that IP Masq is better with UDP, any truth in that?

Any refs would be good. Thanks for the help.

Jim
jameso@elwood.net


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message