From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 14 08:20:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F4CD16A4CE for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 08:20:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hanoi.cronyx.ru (hanoi.cronyx.ru [144.206.181.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256A743D5F for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 08:19:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: (from root@localhost) by hanoi.cronyx.ru id i4EFH6QD044929 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org.checked; (8.12.8/vak/2.1) Fri, 14 May 2004 19:17:06 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: from cronyx.ru (hi.cronyx.ru [144.206.181.94]) by hanoi.cronyx.ru with ESMTP id i4EFFDxV044841; (8.12.8/vak/2.1) Fri, 14 May 2004 19:15:13 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Message-ID: <40A4E2CB.2000007@cronyx.ru> Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 19:16:27 +0400 From: Roman Kurakin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031208 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marcel Moolenaar References: <40A26162.9030607@cronyx.ru> <20040512.200542.09569104.imp@bsdimp.com> <40A37468.3060608@cronyx.ru> <20040513155109.GB6572@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <20040513155109.GB6572@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sio & Puc memory mapped X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 15:20:00 -0000 May I ask you to make some tests for me? We have a set of tests, which we use for testings of our async adapters. I add support for one of ours cards via puc(4)&uart(4) drivers. These tests works fine with patches for sio(4) driver (was tested with 5.2 sio), but fails with puc(4)&uart(4). I don't have any other cards supported by uart(4), so I can't test it by my self. If you have a time and ability, I'll send these tests for you. rik Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 05:13:12PM +0400, Roman Kurakin wrote: > > >>M. Warner Losh wrote: >> >> >>>In message: <40A26162.9030607@cronyx.ru> >>> Roman Kurakin writes: >>>: Does any body workin on support for memory mapped serial adapters? >>> >>>uart should support it. You may be able to enhance puc to attach uart >>>to your card. >>> >>> >>I didn't notice that mem-cards have uart(4) type in puc(4) driver when I >>started to dig. >> >> >They don't. uart(4) is a replacement for sio(4), not a an addendum to it. > > >>I was sure that it should be sio part. >> >> >So was I. > >