From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 2 04:54:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BE8E2E7; Sat, 2 Aug 2014 04:54:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "troutmask.apl.washington.edu", Issuer "troutmask.apl.washington.edu" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A494286E; Sat, 2 Aug 2014 04:54:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s724sc3R030193 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 1 Aug 2014 21:54:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id s724scaY030192; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 21:54:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 21:54:38 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: William Grzybowski Subject: Re: math/lapack broken Message-ID: <20140802045438.GA30183@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20140802004717.GA29541@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2014 04:54:40 -0000 On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 10:14:43PM -0300, William Grzybowski wrote: > I can't help but notice how unrespectful you have been. > Its not the first message ranting about something broken. > I can't help but notice how poorly some decisions are made within the ports community, and no, this isn't the nearly the first poor decision. If the port has an option to build the profiled libraries and that option is selected, then I expect the port to build the profiled library. -- Steve