From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 30 22:05:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2747516A4CE; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 22:05:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA8943D1F; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 22:05:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 98D505148A; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 15:05:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 15:05:21 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Steven Hartland Message-ID: <20050430220520.GC52286@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050430213556.GA51804@xor.obsecurity.org> <005301c54dce$14ee2400$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <005301c54dce$14ee2400$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: d.wagner@absamail.co.za cc: cy@FreeBSD.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: screen-4.0.2_1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 22:05:23 -0000 --Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 10:46:32PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 06:22:38PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: >=20 > >>So I assume that's why it was removed but tbh I haven't had this happen= =20 > >>since > >>5.1 days and removing the package is therefore a pain and should be put > >>back IMO. > >From: "Kris Kennaway" > > > >The bug still exists as far as anyone knows. The reason you haven't > >seen it happen is because you're no longer using the package. >=20 > All our installs are done via pxe using a custom install.cfg which just > has a sudo package with dependencies to all the base packages we require > including screen and not as single machine has had an issue since 5.1 > but maybe thats just me. I know for certain that the problem existed after 5.1 (I only added the NO_PACKAGE tag less than a year ago), so I guess you're just lucky. No-one ever tracked down the circumstances that caused the package to go into a spin anyway. Kris --Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCdAEgWry0BWjoQKURAq4eAJ9GT1BjWfJhZ5t47Pr/HDzTXM5TqgCaAoRX yeIyH5C2wwMbRIfd79UQCm8= =zUK1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx--