From owner-freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org Sat Dec 15 03:09:21 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gecko@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25201331012 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2018 03:09:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5170080FD0 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2018 03:09:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 146F51331011; Sat, 15 Dec 2018 03:09:21 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: gecko@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C901331010 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2018 03:09:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E93E80FCF for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2018 03:09:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1D337D0F for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2018 03:09:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id wBF39Jn1001725 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2018 03:09:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id wBF39Jtg001714 for gecko@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 15 Dec 2018 03:09:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gecko@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 234020] www/firefox: Do we have prior written permission to patch and use official branding? Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 03:09:20 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: cem@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Works As Intended X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: gecko@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gecko Rendering Engine issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 03:09:22 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D234020 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Closed Resolution|--- |Works As Intended --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #1) > Probably[1] The first document looks promising, but it's unclear what the context was ("your builds are configured so closely to ours") at the time (and it's unc= lear what the time was). (The file has a 2004 timestamp on it, which seems improbable =E2=80=94 that was shortly after the name changed from Firebird.) I guess the written permission in that document is pretty broad, so maybe w= e're still fine. I guess I would feel more comfortable if I knew how our patchs= et today compares with the one from whenever the permission was granted, but, = what the hell. It answers my question/concern. > Mozilla themselves don't provide FreeBSD binaries. Many port patches are > due to lack of manpower to clean up the cruft and upstream the rest. None of this is relevant to Mozilla's exercise of their trademark rights. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=