From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Jun  6 01:19:50 1996
Return-Path: owner-stable
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id BAA09909
          for stable-outgoing; Thu, 6 Jun 1996 01:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA09902;
          Thu, 6 Jun 1996 01:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA29758; Thu, 6 Jun 1996 01:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
To: Chris Watson <scanner@webspan.net>
cc: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>, stable@FreeBSD.org,
        committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Status of -stable 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 06 Jun 1996 03:49:17 EDT."
             <Pine.BSI.3.93.960606034832.3036C-100000@orion.webspan.net> 
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 1996 01:17:07 -0700
Message-ID: <29756.834049027@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Well, Hmmm I LIKED the -stable tree.

No question. If you don't actually have to be the one maintaining it,
it's great! :-)

> release with bug fixes.
> Im gonna cry when you murder the poor thing.

People have been suggesting that we resurrect "the patch kit" and I
really don't know what to say about that.  If someone else were to do
the actual grunt work, sure, I guess I could see it working.  The
group at large would certainly be more cooperative partners that
Jolitz ever was :-).

					Jordan