From owner-freebsd-current Thu Dec 12 11:37:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC3E37B4DE for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 11:37:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.identd.net (matrix.identd.net [64.172.21.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4939F43EB2 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2002 11:37:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mtm@identd.net) Received: (qmail 34139 invoked by uid 1007); 12 Dec 2002 19:37:37 -0000 Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 11:37:37 -0800 From: Mike Makonnen To: "Daniel C. Sobral" Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RC NG, ntp and routed Message-ID: <20021212193737.GA33999@matrix.identd.net> References: <3DF61DE4.9070205@tcoip.com.br> <20021210225014.GA22267@matrix.identd.net> <20021211002318.GT45512@roark.gnf.org> <20021211054754.GA23972@matrix.identd.net> <20021211063348.GU45512@roark.gnf.org> <20021211084603.GA24584@matrix.identd.net> <20021211171527.GW45512@roark.gnf.org> <3DF775AC.40507@tcoip.com.br> <20021212053826.GB30023@matrix.identd.net> <3DF86054.7000400@tcoip.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3DF86054.7000400@tcoip.com.br> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/4.7-STABLE (i386) Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 08:09:24AM -0200, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: >=20 > I mean that routed is _one_ routing daemon, one that supports the old,=20 > would someone please shot it in the head to give it peace, RIP. If you=20 > happen to run a modern routing protocol... hell, if you happen to run a= =20 > middle-aged routing protocol, you'll be using something else. >=20 > And, since you do not seem to be aware of it, Zebra, for one, is run as... >=20 > router_enable=3D"YES" > router=3D"/usr/local/sbin/zebractl" > router_flags=3D"start" If you are using a daemon essential to network connectivity in /usr/local and at the same time have it (/usr/local) mounted remotely, then you haven't thought things through properly. Listen, I think we're talking past each other here. I _am_ in favour of adding routing to NETWORKING (look at an earlier email in the thread). My only argument is that if an admin chooses to use a daemon from ports then he should be bright enough to include it in a local filesystem. Cheers. --=20 Mike Makonnen | GPG-KEY: http://www.identd.net/~mtm/mtm.asc mtm@identd.net | Fingerprint: D228 1A6F C64E 120A A1C9 A3AA DAE1 E2AF DBCC= 68B9 --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9+OV/2uHir9vMaLkRAmJnAKCNxslRyhM+NzTfMHeHuNoODscLSgCfe2O8 AJt6/x6YeCuxIb01YZco/KM= =HZKv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message