From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 23 17:21:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freeway.dcfinc.com (cx74889-a.phnx3.az.home.com [24.1.193.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6D337B403 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 17:21:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from chad@localhost) by freeway.dcfinc.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA19817; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 17:20:57 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from chad) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 17:20:56 -0700 From: "Chad R. Larson" To: Kutulu Cc: Warner Losh , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: loopback not working for anything other than 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <20010923172056.A19684@freeway.dcfinc.com> References: <001201c143de$f4eeb590$0a01a8c0@den2> <200109230349.f8N3n5746094@harmony.village.org> <000901c143f0$11990ea0$9865fea9@longhill1.md.home.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <000901c143f0$11990ea0$9865fea9@longhill1.md.home.com>; from kutulu@kutulu.org on Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 01:24:49AM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 01:24:49AM -0400, Kutulu wrote: > Linux does have some company, though not very prestigious... from Win2k > Professional: > > Pinging 127.1.2.3 with 32 bytes of data: > > Reply from 127.1.2.3: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128 > Reply from 127.1.2.3: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128 > Reply from 127.1.2.3: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128 > Reply from 127.1.2.3: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128 > > Ping statistics for 127.1.2.3: > Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), > Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: > Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms Interesting. There's been a popular rumour that Microsoft availed itself to the liberal BSD license, and availed itself to the FreeBSD protocol stack. The rumor further said that if you pointed an OS fingerprinting program at a Win2k box it would be identified as FreeBSD. That would not seem to be the case now (if it ever was). Attached is the output of an nmap scan of my Sony Vaio with Win2k Pro. And yes, it will respond to pings of any 127.0.0.0/8 address. > --K -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.com DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="vaio.scan" # Log of: nmap -v -sT -O -F -o /tmp/vaio.scan vaio Interesting ports on vaio.dcfinc.com (192.168.1.17): Port State Protocol Service 7 open tcp echo 9 open tcp discard 13 open tcp daytime 17 open tcp qotd 19 open tcp chargen 135 open tcp loc-srv 139 open tcp netbios-ssn 445 open tcp microsoft-ds 1025 open tcp listen TCP Sequence Prediction: Class=random positive increments Difficulty=16939 (Worthy challenge) Sequence numbers: F3631C8 F3713DD F37EFFF F3876CC F39CC34 F3A9F3C No OS matches for host (see http://www.insecure.org/cgi-bin/nmap-submit.cgi). TCP/IP fingerprint: TSeq(Class=RI%gcd=1%SI=2885) TSeq(Class=RI%gcd=1%SI=2283) TSeq(Class=RI%gcd=1%SI=422B) T1(Resp=Y%DF=Y%W=402E%ACK=S++%Flags=AS%Ops=MNWNNT) T2(Resp=Y%DF=N%W=0%ACK=S%Flags=AR%Ops=) T3(Resp=Y%DF=Y%W=402E%ACK=S++%Flags=AS%Ops=MNWNNT) T4(Resp=Y%DF=N%W=0%ACK=O%Flags=R%Ops=) T5(Resp=Y%DF=N%W=0%ACK=S++%Flags=AR%Ops=) T6(Resp=Y%DF=N%W=0%ACK=O%Flags=R%Ops=) T7(Resp=Y%DF=N%W=0%ACK=S++%Flags=AR%Ops=) PU(Resp=Y%DF=N%TOS=0%IPLEN=38%RIPTL=148%RID=E%RIPCK=E%UCK=E%ULEN=134%DAT=E) --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message