From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Sep 14 02:24:07 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB41316A41A
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 02:24:07 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au)
Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B3E13C457
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 14 Sep 2007 02:24:05 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au)
Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost)
	by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.5) with SMTP id MAA13311;
	Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:23:48 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au)
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:23:47 +1000 (EST)
From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>
To: Andreas Pettersson <andpet@telia.com>
In-Reply-To: <46E97100.8060703@telia.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1070914122107.11716A-100000@gaia.nimnet.asn.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: BIND 9.3.1 - How to get rid of AAAA querys?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 02:24:07 -0000

On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Andreas Pettersson wrote:

 > > [snip]
 > > 	Why don't you go the other way and get yourself IPv6
 > > 	connectivity.  You do realise that you will require it to
 > > 	reach many sites in about 3 years time as they will be IPv6
 > > 	only
 > 
 > For almost 10 years I've heard discussions about the successor to IPv4, 
 > but from my point of view (may differ from others..) not much has 
 > happened. Of course, I can imagine that when the wheel starts rolling 
 > for real things might change quickly. 3 years may prove to be correct, 
 > but are there any clear signs pointing in this direction?

eg:

http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4/index.html

http://www.circleid.com/posts/transition_to_ipv6_address/

http://www.circleid.com/posts/ipv6_extinction_evolution_or_revolution/

Cheers, Ian