Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:25:23 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com> Cc: Fuyuhiko Maruyama <fuyuhik8@is.titech.ac.jp>, java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Reproduceable bug in latest JDK 1.3.1p4 Message-ID: <3B9F4623.537D84BE@FreeBSD.org> References: <200109110917.f8B9HfF41785@vega.vega.com> <55g09t78ff.wl@tripper.private> <20010912070358.A5392@misty.eyesbeyond.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greg Lewis wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 05:56:52AM +0900, Fuyuhiko Maruyama wrote: > > At Tue, 11 Sep 2001 12:17:41 +0300 (EEST), > > Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > > > > [1 <text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)>] > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > I found that there is a fully reproduceable bug in JDK 1.3.1p4. It can be > > > triggered by starting Robocode (ports/games/robocode) and selecting > > > "Help->Online Help" from the menu. Rather strange, but when I'm running > > > the program with java_g instead of java, the bug not shows up. > > > > > > Attached please find appropriate log and stacktrace. > > > > > > -Maxim > > I couldn't reproduce your problem on my FreeBSD 4.4-RC at all. > > I think you are using FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT, so I would like to know the > > attached patch helps you or not. This patch makes more wrappers on > > 5.0-CURRENT for syscalls should be wrapped by green_threads JVM. > > I also couldn't reproduce the problem, although there were some stack > traces from caught exceptions and so forth (the JVM didn't crash though). Yes, I know. This is what I saw with java_g and linux-jdk1.3.1.01. > Maxim, can you also say if you are using XFree86 3.3.6 or 4? I don't > have the same symbol font messages when I try out robocode. Also, were > you connected to the 'net at the time? I'm using XFree86 3.3.6 and yes, I was connected at that time. > I'm also starting to wonder if the patchset is applying correctly :(. > I know its not for some of the files involved in the plugin build, but > now I'm starting to wonder about other new files. I think we may have > to add a pre-patch target to the port at least. How that could be? Perhaps I am missing something, but patch either applies, or not, how it could apply "incorrectly"? -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B9F4623.537D84BE>