Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 21:15:54 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 228108] if_ipsec drops all the icmp v4&v6 error messages Message-ID: <bug-228108-7501-ZuLZTbgtHb@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-228108-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-228108-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D228108 dpd@dpdtech.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dpd@dpdtech.com --- Comment #9 from dpd@dpdtech.com --- This change breaks ICMP ECHO (pings) to the receiving end of peer to peer /= 30 of the IPsec tunnel between FreeBSD and Juniper JunOS on their SRX products= .=20 To JunOS 12.x, this seems to block both ICMP and BGP packets to the other e= nd of the tunnel (being compared to 11.1-STABLE r331329), which works in this setup. To JunOS 17.x and an SRX, OSPF seems to work, but ICMP ECHO does not. (I do= n't yet have BGP in this setup). However, between 11.1-STABLE r331329 and 11.2-STABLE r335594, IPsec tunnels= get established, pings work, and BGP does establish. In the case of 11.2 -> JunOS 17, the tunnels and OSPF did come up, and ICMP does work routed across the tunnel, just not to the tunnel's termination po= int.=20 I can't seem to explain it, and seemly a little strange mix of OS and hardw= are, but reverting this one line seemed to fix all the issues I had. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-228108-7501-ZuLZTbgtHb>