From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 15 17:30:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8426B106564A for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:30:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B808FC0C for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:30:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m3FHU3Rf054616 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:30:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m3FHU36x054615; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:30:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:30:03 GMT Message-Id: <200804151730.m3FHU36x054615@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Christopher Cowart Cc: Subject: Re: bin/112694: segfault in pam_lastlog(8) on sshd exit when no pty allocated X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Christopher Cowart List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:30:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/112694; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Christopher Cowart To: Jaakko Heinonen Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/112694: segfault in pam_lastlog(8) on sshd exit when no pty allocated Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:25:38 -0700 --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jaakko Heinonen wrote: > I can't reproduce this on 7.0-RELEASE. I think that this might have been > fixed in src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_lastlog/pam_lastlog.c revision 1.23 > (MFCd to RELENG_6 also). Can you confirm? We removed lastlog from sshd and added it to login. After doing so, it behaved as we expected. I think when we run it both via the sshd and login stacks, it gets executed twice for logouts. If your testing shows no segfaults in that situation, I'm content that the problem is solved. Thanks, --=20 Chris Cowart Network Technical Lead Network & Infrastructure Services, RSSP-IT UC Berkeley --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iQIVAwUBSATlEiPHEDszU3zYAQL4hg/9GDSe9/yLxgXzO5DtmbNjNNRfctlXr5ps zlifury2xWQ1i81qh9wCUSiGTQJMkdRVrctyf//SfbyPswY3pYlY1eBp2YoF7hRv Uyr/Qr/nIyfm27SDESzo08gXpZh/ehtQMZzyOwWrEeW5CMpBUoLCwPuWHKmGXTWG xmms6fmBd1jC4L2RlBmgQbk3YlTvNXw5gzEKfDfV1Z72q4wMBv+HnKPDGNcM4wPJ P/XqRgzVDhmytNe99db7GjjOdG0U9B6ehIFDgExtNqOWLAqqtEQtLJsRJtpLWFuk rre8ft4zPhuzJZoN0ZGk0iJEtMHzm+QJIs5djjhg179cqnPCGd8qB0sN/vPrEMz1 w3r6B4kXaPyXQfQX4mC3zX5VHaP4j8F6uh+OtrhNln0+rTCOWJWehWRI6AqchtN3 PlKzYIloWdO/XfDZv+vI7Jj2q8lNPTXXD1YOiOuYwECtsu3zi316fov9Gwk5buNW jX6toXBAJQ6P6y8wVMk/IAxE+ycPYruupLYL9A4OO/Ke6/aHhYyWVrcBc4r6CWh8 f5jNCNrflc/q6x2NODzUnb93iaVZFkBApiYFB/B+wqgW4D5NBNfZ8TGBlhfTN2PO tIkrSUnzYfS6uumQsvjWkMhD6xAVMUmjLjMe34ajRynKbujmbRwehLITzMUcWJnc 1MY4iT4Mw/E= =le+A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp--