From owner-freebsd-advocacy  Tue Aug 10  2:37:41 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586CF14D04
	for <freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 10 Aug 1999 02:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA02034;
	Tue, 10 Aug 1999 11:34:20 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from des)
To: Laurence Berland <stuyman@confusion.net>
Cc: Dominic Mitchell <Dom.Mitchell@palmerharvey.co.uk>,
	Joel Sutton <jsutton@bbcon.com.au>, brian@pobox.com,
	freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: [ADV] Marketing / Differentiating FreeBSD
References: <19990808025724.13926.rocketmail@web1001.mail.yahoo.com> <Pine.BSF.3.96.990808130254.14636A-100000@stargate.home> <19990809123221.B1888@voodoo.pandhm.co.uk> <37AEC1C8.3663A849@confusion.net>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Date: 10 Aug 1999 11:34:19 +0200
In-Reply-To: Laurence Berland's message of "Mon, 09 Aug 1999 07:55:52 -0400"
Message-ID: <xzpd7wwvv1g.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 11
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34
Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Laurence Berland <stuyman@confusion.net> writes:
> don't you mean "Open Source software compatible!"
> Open Source isn't a trademark, a copyright, or anything else that would
> prevent me from claiming the windows 2000 is open source, except perhaps
> a false advertising law suit.

Open Source is a trademark of the Open Source Initiative.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message