From owner-freebsd-small Wed Sep 16 00:09:18 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA17825 for freebsd-small-outgoing; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 00:09:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from korin.warman.org.pl (korin.nask.waw.pl [148.81.160.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA17818 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 00:09:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from abial@nask.pl) Received: from localhost (abial@localhost) by korin.warman.org.pl (8.9.1/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA09275; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 09:13:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: korin.warman.org.pl: abial owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 09:13:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Andrzej Bialecki X-Sender: abial@korin.warman.org.pl To: chad@dcfinc.com cc: Chris Avis , linux-embedded@waste.org, freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux or FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <199809160430.VAA18189@freebie.dcfinc.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 15 Sep 1998, Chad R. Larson wrote: > > I have been using Redhat Linux for some time and will admit > > that I sometimes get confused with the different variants of > > Linux and the different ways things are done (e.g. Caldera). > > In this respect the FreeBSD solution is extremely well > > documented in the "FreeBSD Handbook". > > > > Does anyone have any suggestions ? > > I have run both Linux and FreeBSD systems for a couple of years. > > My opinion (the only one I'm qualified to offer) is that FreeBSD is > =very= much better in unity of the package, and generally from the view > of someone who wants to use the system in a production environment. > > Linux, on the other hand, leads if you're looking for bleeding-edge > (like device drivers for the latest-n-greatest sound card) or are > concerned with POSIX compatibility. ^^^^^^^^^^^ Hmm... that's not to say that FreeBSD is not concerned with being POSIX compliant :-) 3.0-RELEASE is _very_ close to the latest published standards. As for the original question: I'd say that both projects are pretty young, and I think you should choose what suits you best :-)). I don't know the folks behind the Linux project, but I'll keep trying to develop PicoBSD, so that it's easy to use in embedded products, and at the same time it's very close to the normal FreeBSD environment (unlike the ELKS project). Also, my personal opinion is that it's much easier to use FreeBSD in commercial situations, because GPL requires you to publish your kernel modifications, which is bad. You don't have this problem with FreeBSD (see commercial examples of Whistle's InterJet and www.gta.com GnatBox). And, as an incentive for you :-)) - there is almost ready the native FreeBSD driver for M-Systems DiskOnChip flash... Andrzej Bialecki -------------------- ++-------++ ------------------------------------- ||PicoBSD|| FreeBSD in your pocket? Go and see: Research & Academic |+-------+| "Small & Embedded FreeBSD" Network in Poland | |TT~~~| | http://www.freebsd.org/~picobsd/ -------------------- ~-+==---+-+ ------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message