From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Jun 26 07:50:51 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id HAA15692
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 26 Jun 1995 07:50:51 -0700
Received: (from phk@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id HAA15673
          ; Mon, 26 Jun 1995 07:50:47 -0700
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk>
Message-Id: <199506261450.HAA15673@freefall.cdrom.com>
Subject: Re: Crypt code summary(2).
To: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com (Rodney W. Grimes)
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 07:50:47 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: mark@grondar.za, wollman@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu, current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199506260910.CAA03201@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> from "Rodney W. Grimes" at Jun 26, 95 02:10:10 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 795       
Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> > > That certainly is a possibility. It is not _my_ #1 choice, though.
> > 
> > I going to counter Garrett, and say:  Put it in the main branch.
> 
> I am going to counter Poul, and agree with Garrett, and give reasons
> for doing so.
> 
> a)  It is very likely to change as RFC's get done to cover this and
>     we will more or less be forced to rip out what ever we had done
>     to implement what is in the RFCs.

SSL is implemented in NetScape.  It's unlikely to change at all.

I already stated my argumentes earlier.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@ref.tfs.com       TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Just that: dried leaves in boiling water ?