From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec  2 21:10:52 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F521065672
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  2 Dec 2008 21:10:52 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dan-freebsd-questions@ourbrains.org)
Received: from ourbrains.org (li48-221.members.linode.com [66.246.76.221])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F1EC58FC12
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  2 Dec 2008 21:10:51 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dan-freebsd-questions@ourbrains.org)
Received: (qmail 20826 invoked by uid 1000); 2 Dec 2008 21:11:13 -0000
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 16:11:13 -0500
From: Dan <dan-freebsd-questions@ourbrains.org>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20081202211113.GA19886@ourbrains.org>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
References: <200812010959.15647.kirk@strauser.com>
	<gh1erh$n6s$1@ger.gmane.org> <4934E276.3050308@comcast.net>
	<9bbcef730812020120w539a8f14jc496b14c2fbd52ad@mail.gmail.com>
	<20081202110922.T14849@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<20081202170805.GA20420@ourbrains.org>
	<20081202190351.Q16084@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<gh40l2$kuc$1@ger.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <gh40l2$kuc$1@ger.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Subject: Re: Disenchanted with ZFS; alternatives?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:10:52 -0000

Ivan Voras(ivoras@freebsd.org)@2008.12.02 20:00:46 +0100:
> Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> >>
> >> It's already usable on DragonFly. DragonFLY itself is stable, but only
> >> supports one CPUIt probably will never be ported to FreeBSD due to
> >> API differences.
> >=20
> > time to wait and see if they will really make dragonfly faster than
> > FreeBSD (it's their goal)...
>=20
> http://people.freebsd.org/~kris/scaling/dfly.html
>=20
> Good luck to them, they need it :)
>=20

That's a stupid benchmark. DragonFly doesn't have SMP support yet.

As already mentioned, they don't have SMP yet. Scalable SMP is the
ultimate goal though, and once they get rid of giant lock,=20
the SMP won't take that long.