From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 9 14:42:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E06316A403; Sat, 9 Dec 2006 14:42:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sakura.ninth-nine.com (sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F141643CA0; Sat, 9 Dec 2006 14:41:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from nadesico.ninth-nine.com (nadesico.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.122]) by sakura.ninth-nine.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NinthNine) with SMTP id kB9Efd5l031599; Sat, 9 Dec 2006 23:41:39 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2006 23:41:39 +0900 From: Norikatsu Shigemura To: Mikhail Teterin Message-Id: <20061209234139.2bcb88fe.nork@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200611291052.23327@aldan> References: <20061127222709.aa35ab22.nork@FreeBSD.org> <200611290957.26508@aldan> <44irgyjlyf.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <200611291052.23327@aldan> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.3.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.121]); Sat, 09 Dec 2006 23:41:41 +0900 (JST) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Lowell Gilbert , Norikatsu Shigemura Subject: Re: ports/devel/icu: PTHREAD_LIBS clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 14:42:27 -0000 On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 10:52:22 -0500 Mikhail Teterin wrote: > I know. And the ICU developers think, threads should be enabled by default. > The reason they aren't right now -- in the FreeBSD port -- is because of > certain bugs in thread implementation(s) on FreeBSD/ia64, which lead to > crashes in ICU. > Since nothing is using ICU in a multi-threaded fashion _right now_, the > current version of the port builds without threads by default. Norikatsu > confirms, he is not calling into ICU from multiple threads either, hence my > suggestion, he does not need to change the option. I just hope to respect PTHREAD_LIBS. But if you hope no thread feature, I don't use thread feature and test it.