Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 09:51:49 -0800 From: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: howto stop port from installing .la files ? Message-ID: <20030301175149.GQ37397@procyon.firepipe.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0303011634080.738@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0302272130150.72813@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <20030227223051.GA91669@rot13.obsecurity.org> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0303011335320.738@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <200303011713.19351.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <1046535678.310.5.camel@gyros> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0303011634080.738@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 04:59:34PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > So would correct statement be s.th. like: they are useless as long > as the port doesn't use lt_dlopen or lt_dlopenext ? Almost. As long as nothing that depends on it (plus itself) uses lt_dlopen(), the .la files are not neeeded. I guess that can be extended to "As long as X library will never be opened via lt_dlopen(), libX.la isn't needed." I think it's a bad assumption to make. Regards, -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030301175149.GQ37397>