Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 14:01:27 -0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: cpghost <cpghost@cordula.ws> Cc: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "no matching session" in ng_pppoe.c 1.74.2.4? (RELENG_6) Message-ID: <475C65B7.20708@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20071209215808.68c22b2c@epia-2.farid-hajji.net> References: <20071206030500.746c782d@epia-2.farid-hajji.net> <4757E39C.8020009@FreeBSD.org> <20071206161107.3c0c9a82@epia-2.farid-hajji.net> <20071209173359.710ea5bd@epia-2.farid-hajji.net> <475C3E49.6000906@elischer.org> <20071209215808.68c22b2c@epia-2.farid-hajji.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
cpghost wrote: > On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 11:13:13 -0800 > Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> wrote: > >>> ----------- manually restarting ppp(1), then: >>> ------------------------ >>> >>> 17:10:47.306928 00:00:24:c2:45:74 > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype >>> PPPoE D (0x8863), length 32: PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0x40C663C1] >>> [Service-Name] >>> >>> 17:10:47.306939 00:00:24:c2:45:74 > ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff, ethertype >>> PPPoE D (0x8863), length 32: PPPoE PADI [Host-Uniq 0xC06220C1] >>> [Service-Name] >>> >> we still have 2 sessions instead of 1, but there is less confusion >> so things sort themselves out. > > Just one more thing: > > If I remember correctly, sending two PADIs in quick succession > was ppp's "normal" behaviour for *years* now (is it expected or > required by the protocol? I don't know). I've always wondered > why it was so. But that didn't cause any harm as it seemed one > of the two PADO was picked up and eventually turned into a session. > > -cpghost. > btw try mpd as well.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?475C65B7.20708>