From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 2 05:08:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD582B68; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 05:08:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F8DCEAA; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 05:08:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (ppp121-45-246-72.lns20.per2.internode.on.net [121.45.246.72]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sB258TD5048632 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 1 Dec 2014 21:08:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <547D4947.4040203@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:08:23 +0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: witness and modules. References: <54788FF3.3030602@freebsd.org> <2805430.yZtslRjaC7@ralph.baldwin.cx> In-Reply-To: <2805430.yZtslRjaC7@ralph.baldwin.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 05:08:33 -0000 On 12/1/14, 11:39 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Friday, November 28, 2014 11:08:35 PM Julian Elischer wrote: >> Do we need to compile all modules with witness definitions when >> linking with a kernel compiled with witness? >> This was true at one stage but I remember some work was done to make >> them compatible. > You should not need this. modules always call functions in the kernel for > lock operations and this functions are what invoke WITNESS. > that's what I thought but empirical evidence disagrees. I'll try some more cases.