Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 16:43:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Kurt Lidl <lidl@pix.net> Subject: Re: [Heads Up] RCS removed from base Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.1310081641350.8822@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <201310082033.r98KXUgJ058127@slippy.cwsent.com> References: <201310082033.r98KXUgJ058127@slippy.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Cy Schubert wrote: > > I've started work on a port (not that this was my highest priority but > received a private email that I may want to do this instead of rcs57). > Would the majority here rather have it in base? Just finished schlepping > the OpenBSD source to my laptop (the link to the OpenRCS site returns a TCP > RST). I don't mind either way. It's the groups's and the Project's call. It seems to have ben taken out without much discussion, and we're in the process of releasing 10.0, so I'd say put it back in base. After 10.0 goes out (or is branched), then we can have a proper discussion about how to remove it and what, if any, to replace it with. -- DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.1310081641350.8822>