Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 22:37:51 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Kal Torak <kaltorak@quake.com.au> Cc: Steve Tremblett <sjt@cisco.com>, Joel CARNAT <joel.carnat@noos.fr>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is OpenBSD safer than other BSDs ? Message-ID: <20010601223751.A93583@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <3B185B48.C56DF742@quake.com.au>; from kaltorak@quake.com.au on Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 01:19:36PM %2B1000 References: <20010601195419.3283ef01.joel.carnat@noos.fr> <20010601140605.M18959@sjt-u10.cisco.com> <20010601152105.A89287@xor.obsecurity.org> <3B185B48.C56DF742@quake.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 01:19:36PM +1000, Kal Torak wrote: > The only problem seems that sometimes security advisories via the > announce list come later than for OpenBSD... Which shouldnt matter > much if you are really security conscious you will be reading bugtraq > and the like... On the other hand, we release advisories for a wider range of problems than OpenBSD do.. > Is it just me or has there STILL not been an advisory on the ntpd > remote root hole?! (I may have missed it or something I guess)... You mean ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-01:31.ntpd.asc? from almost 2 months ago? ;-) Kris --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7GHuvWry0BWjoQKURAn4WAJ9N1weR2Pu6FXwXBCuhJzeeq8HqRACfTR4L 7U+daxWTaXNINNe1LL6NcQ4= =mkxk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010601223751.A93583>