From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat May 11 18:34:23 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id SAA10358
          for ports-outgoing; Sat, 11 May 1996 18:34:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from hsu@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id SAA10352
          for ports; Sat, 11 May 1996 18:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 11 May 1996 18:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jeffrey Hsu <hsu>
Message-Id: <199605120134.SAA10352@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: ports
Subject: Re: teTeX port broken?
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

  >  The current port works.

Yep, I'm running it right now.  Thanks.

  > a minor update of teTeX's texmf tree has been released last week

Argh, and I just installed the old version this morning.

  > You already have to be root when you run "make".

Yes, I broke down and read the pre-extract script and fiugred this
out.  Satoshi, why do we enforce mtree permissions for /usr/local?
I hate having to be root to install packages after I make them and
in this case, there's actually a port which require you to be root
when you're building it.  I sometimes chmod the group permissions
on my /usr/local tree, but this gets wiped out the next time I do
a make install because mtree changes it back.

  > BTW: Why do you not install the teTeX package?

I have strange CFLAGS options and the port does a CFLAGS = instead of
a CFLAGS += to add a -D parameter.