Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:25:31 +0400 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, "Constantine A. Murenin" <cnst@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: sensors fun.. Message-ID: <20071017202531.GB78324@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <52116.1192652445@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <47166BA5.1000100@elischer.org> <52116.1192652445@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 08:20:45PM +0000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <47166BA5.1000100@elischer.org>, Julian Elischer writes: > > >> Having a userland > >> interface also makes it easier to have backends that are entirely in > >> userland. > >> > >maybe a loopback filesystem > > Just what is it that is so enticing about the kernel ? Why not simply > pass it to a daemon ? What about DEVFS idea like /dev/sensors/* ? Sensors _are_ devices, not sysctls. -- http://ache.pp.ru/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071017202531.GB78324>